American Idol Season 12 Elimination: Sorry Devin, but Lazaro Survives
I know I am not the only person in the world who was hoping by some miracle it would be Lazaro Arbos eliminated last night on American Idol, but of course it was Devin Velez instead. It is not like Devin had a prayer of actually winning the whole competition after being in the Bottom 3 for the third straight week, but in terms of actual singing ability, he is light years ahead of Lazaro. I have taken the latest WhatNotToSing performance scores (sorted from highest to lowest by their solo performances only) and updated them with last night's results, making the columns yellow for any week where a contestant was in the Bottom 3, red when they are eliminated (sorry, Devin) and either pink or blue otherwise depending on their gender. The chart now has 5 columns for each contestant to help show their trend for the past 5 weeks. Several observations are very clear:
1) Janelle Arthur has definitely been improving and now is definitely a contender. I am curious to see how the odds makers will place her after two pretty good weeks for her after her first few weeks were okay but not stellar. She is now catching up with the leading contestants like...
2) Candice Glover who is the most consistently good (with Kree Harrison narrowly behind her.) But now the expectations for both of them are high every week. So if they have an off week they will start looking like...
3) Angie Miller who peaked early and has been on a downward trend, especially the last couple weeks with some not so impressive performances. Luckily I believe she has a very big fan base and will probably be safe for a few more weeks. No matter how unimpressive her performances may be she will still probably last longer than...
4) Amber Holcomb who has been consistently good but needed that Bottom 3 week to fire up her voting fans. This week she was not in the Bottom 3, but she has to keep bringing more interesting performances or she will end up like...
5) Devin Velez, an impeccable vocalist but a not so interesting entertainer. Devin also started strong but people got bored with his very well delivered but sleepy performances. Now he has plenty of time to practice all the words to all the group songs for the tour so he can repeatedly bail out...
6) Lazaro Arbos who is also one of the most consistent singers on the show, but he is consistently bad. I was happy to finally see him in the Bottom 3, but we all knew it would not be him headed home. His enunciation when he sings is terrible, and he seems to be a nervous wreck. It is hard to believe he is the only guy left except for...
7) Burnell Taylor, who is the only male with a shot of finishing in the Top 3. Burnell does have a great tone and sound to his vocals, but he needs to liven things up too. Hopefully since next week is "rock week" it will give some of the sleepier contestants like Burnell (and Amber) a chance to deliver some excitement in their performances. They need it if either of those two want to end up in the Top 3.
Interview: Aaron Wallace, Author of 'The Thinking Fan's Guide to Walt Disney World: Magic Kingdom'
Aaron Wallace is something of a celebrity in the Disney fandom. He has been writing for UltimateDisney/DVDizzy.com- one of the Internet's leading sources of entertainment journalism since 2004, hosts the second-longest running (and often top ranked) Disney podcast, Zip-A-Dee-Doo-Pod and is known for his movie and music reviews, commentaries, opinions, and of course, his end-of-year rankings of the best in music. Aaron has published over two hundred movie, television and music reviews to an audience of millions.
A lawyer based in Orlando, Florida, Aaron has written his first book, The Thinking Fan's Guide to Walt Disney World: Magic Kingdom, a unique look at the attractions in the world's most-visited theme park. It's being published by The Intrepid Traveler, one of the leading publishers of travel books, and will be available in bookstores April 16, 2013.
I had the opportunity to chat with Aaron Wallace and discuss everything from his new book, his Disney faves, his tips for budding writers and much more.
I've always admired your work on the UltimateDisney/DVDizzy.com site, especially your movie reviews. Did you always want to be a writer?
Thank you! And yeah… I think I was writing from the time I could hold a pencil (haha). Early on in school, writing stood out as something that people told me I did well, and I was always fascinated by writers on TV — so I was drawn to it from an early age. At any given time of day, I'm usually either writing or wishing I was writing.
I'm guessing you've always been a big Disney fan since childhood. What is your all-time favorite Disney movie?
I interviewed for the Disney College Program back when I was a student. I was accepted but unfortunately decided not to enroll because I couldn't find a way for the program to make sense in terms of college credits with my particular university, but anyways, I remember during the interview, I told the recruiter that I was "raised on a diet of Disney." It's pretty corny, but it's totally true. I come from a family of Disney fans — they're not fans to the extent that I am, not by any means — but I have so many blissful memories of just watching all these classic, less common Disney films and musicals with my family as a kid. Movies no one talks about, like Candleshoe, which I actually write about in the book. So there's a lot of nostalgia with all that. Picking one favorite is hard, but my go-to answer is Pete's Dragon. It's underrated and people always kind of go "huh?" when I tell them that, but I have so much love for it.
I'm a big fan of your podcast too. I love how you integrate Disney music into the discussion. What is your favorite Disney song?
Oh man, picking a favorite song is even harder than picking a favorite movie. I used to say "Candle on the Water," but I don't think that's true anymore. Maybe "Anything Can Happen" from Mary Poppins on West End. Or "Belle" from Beauty and the Beast. I gravitate toward the big showstoppers, but inspirational lyrics go a long way for me too. "A Change in Me" is good for that.
Speaking of my podcast, Zip-A-Dee-Doo-Pod, I did a Top 100 countdown where I went through a hundred of the greatest Disney songs of all time and analyzed them over the course of four episodes… I can talk about Disney songs for hours, so I'll just stop now (haha).
So about your book. What prompted you to write a book about Walt Disney World?
I think I've always wanted to do it. When I was younger, I kind of pictured myself doing a how-to guide book like Passporter or the Hassle-Free Guide or The Unofficial Guide, you know. Like, I'd take all my friends with me and we'd spend a week researching and making charts. But that ground's already pretty well covered by now, and as a writer, I wanted to actually write, you know — not just technical resource writing, but prose. So I knew I wanted to do something different, and I had all these thoughts swirling in my head about why these Disney attractions mean so much to me and millions of other people. One day, this thought popped in my head — "Space Mountain isn't about being in space, it's about traveling to space from Earth" — and I wrote that down on this white board I had in my apartment at the time. That sentence is actually in the final book, and I developed this whole analysis of Space Mountain out of that one simple sentence, and the book was really born right then.
Why the title "Thinking Fan's Guide"?
The first draft was called The Disney Attractions, and then I submitted a new title, The Thinking Man's Guide to Walt Disney World: Magic Kingdom, to my publisher. It was really inspired by a letter I got from a podcast listener years ago. He called my show "a thinking man's podcast" and that one comment really helped to mold what my show would become. So when I was titling the book, I gave my mom a call and she said, "well you call your podcast a thinking man's show, so why not use that for your book too?" I didn't want to be exclusive in terms of gender, but her suggestion really kind of clicked with what I wanted the book to be — a thoughtful book. So my publisher, The Intrepid Traveler… they loved it. Kelly Monaghan and Sally Scanlon worked on this book with me as my editors, and they came back and said, "what do you think about Fan's instead of Man's?" and that was perfect. Not only is it more inclusive, it's just more fun, too. Fans are naturally thinkers, or at least Disney fans tend to be.
Does your book touch upon every attraction at Magic Kingdom?
Yeah, it does. There are a couple of caveats. Most attractions get their own, full-article-length discussion/analysis in the book, but there are a couple that don't. Two of the newest attractions, Enchanted Tales with Belle and Under the Sea, weren't open in time for us to expand the manuscript and include them, so those two are treated to a more general discussion within the Fantasyland chapter. And then there are some small, sideline diversions — things like Pete's Silly Sideshow and Casey Jr. Splash 'N' Soak Station — which really barely qualify as attractions, so we give those a more general treatment too, though the Splash 'N' Soak Station actually plays a pretty key role in my analysis of Dumbo the Flying Elephant and The Barnstormer Featuring Goofy as the Great Goofini.
I was still able to analyze Fantasyland in depth as "New Fantasyland," which is one of the most intriguing things in the Magic Kingdom right now. And other than that, the book has everything, including things like the fireworks and parades that a lot of books don't cover. I even have a full write-up on Sorcerers of the Magic Kingdom, which is this new, awesomely nerdy game they have in the park.
Do you have a favorite attraction at Magic Kingdom?
I'd have to say Splash Mountain. It's tough because there's a lot of great stuff there and I hate to neglect something like Space Mountain or The Haunted Mansion, but to me, nothing tells a story beginning to end with such total immersion and attention to detail like Splash Mountain. And there's so much to think about with that one, what with the Song of the South controversy and dear Uncle Remus — those are all things that I delve into in the book.
A cool part of your book is the "Watch This" sections at the end of every segment. How did you manage to find such brilliant connections between the theme park attractions and these movies and TV shows?
Well thank you for saying they're brilliant. I didn't want to suggest obvious movies. "If you liked Peter Pan's Flight, you'll love Peter Pan!" That's boring. Instead, I wanted to challenge readers (and myself) to draw a deeper, thematic connection between these attractions and the films I recommend for them. Most of them are Disney movies; a few aren't. But I think that if readers go back and revisit these films, they'll have a lot of "a-ha!" moments where they realize that these unexpected movies have surprisingly rich and relevant connections with the attractions. In fact, I felt pretty validated this past week because Magic Kingdom just added a playful nod to The Apple Dumpling Gang inside the queue for Big Thunder Mountain Railroad, and that just happens to be the movie I picked for Big Thunder. The "Watch This" sections are maybe my favorite feature in the book, and that's something a lot of readers are already writing to me about because it's not the kind of thing you usually find in a guidebook.
A lot of people dream of someday visiting Walt Disney World. How do you think your book will help them?
I'm a firm believer that you should know something about a place before you shell out tons of time and money to go there. You wouldn't travel to Paris or Venice or Cairo without learning a little about the history and culture of the place before getting on the plane. As with anything in life, be it art, or a personal relationship, or a new experience, the more you understand it and the more you take in, the more you appreciate it. I think this book gives people a well-rounded, easily digestible understanding of the Disney theme park experience. The idea is to situate the attractions in their unique historical and cultural contexts, and to give the reader something new and worthwhile to chew on, whether it's their first time at Walt Disney World or their five thousandth.
My hope is that each reader comes away with a deep, meaningful appreciation for the truly special experience that Walt Disney World can be. Your vacation will be such a greater life-long value to you with that kind of background.
There are literally hundreds of Walt Disney World guide books out there. What makes your book stand out from the crowd?
I keep saying it's a "first-of-its-kind book," which is really why I wanted to write it. There are so many great books for trivia or how-to touring, and even some on Disney's architecture and landscaping, but there was really nothing out there that analyzes each Disney attraction as a work of art. I kept looking for a book like that and when I couldn't find one, I decided to write it myself.
I wanted to contribute something new to the "Disneysphere," and I hope I've done that. I think what sets this book apart is that while it does have all the nuts-and-bolts info you need for basic touring, it also endeavors to offer a lighthearted yet scholarly analysis of the Magic Kingdom as a narrative text. After all, if we can think deeply about books and movies and plays, why can't we do the same for theme park rides and shows? They tell stories, too. Or, sometimes, they don't — like with Pirates of the Caribbean. That whole "Dead men tell no tales" thing is really interesting in its own right, which is another topic that's really explored in the book.
Walt Disney World now also includes New Fantasyland. What changes would you like to see over the next few years at the park?
New Fantasyland is exquisite. Maybe not literally perfect, but closer to perfect than it's ever been before. Once they finish everything there next year, I suspect they'll focus on their other theme parks, as well they should. Epcot could use some love, and I'm hoping for a Star Wars-heavy "Lucasland" in Hollywood Studios. But on the subject of Magic Kingdom, with Fantasyland in great shape, they really need to turn their attention to Tomorrowland and/or Adventureland next. Liberty Square's doing pretty well for its size and Main Street is pretty fantastic, but I write at length in the book about Tomorrowland's various problems. Some of those problems are inherent in the very nature of a land focused on "tomorrow," but it really needs an aesthetic update as much as it needs new attractions. Adventureland's doing pretty well in the attractions department, but it's by far the least crowded area at just about any given time of day, so I'd like to see Imagineering take a critical look at how they can rejuvenate guest investment in Adventureland. Tinker Bell meet-and-greets aren't the answer.
So, Walt Disney World has so much more than just Magic Kingdom. There's Epcot, Hollywood Studios and Animal Kingdom as well. Are you planning to write more "Thinking Fan's Guides"?
I think that's the idea. We haven't announced anything yet, but we say in the book that Magic Kingdom is the first in a projected series of books about each of the theme parks, and I definitely have a lot to say about the others. As for where I'll focus next, let's just say I'll likely be eating my fair share of international pastries over the next few months.
There are so many young writers who are students and aspire to write. What advice do you have for them?
Just start. The words won't flow until your fingers have been resting on the keys for a little while. One of my writing professors in college, this ebullient little lady named Ruth Moose, gave all her students a tiny little stand-up frame that reads, "Ruth Moose Says Write On!" I've kept it on the bookshelf by my desk all these years. Think a lot, write a lot, then wait a few weeks and edit a lot. That's what usually works for me, anyway.
Aaron, I want to thank you so much for your time, and I can't wait to read your book!
Thanks, Gary. It's been a pleasure.
You can find Aaron on his Twitter: @aaronspod, and his website www.aaronwallaceonline.com.
Find out more about him at The Intrepid Traveler
Buy The Thinking Fan's Guide to Walt Disney World: Magic Kingdom from Amazon!
Download a free excerpt from The Thinking Fan's Guide right here!
American Idol Album Sales Hold Steady
Phillip = green, Carrie = orange, Kelly = lt blue, Colton = dk blue |
The only other albums on the Idol Chatter list are older albums by Carrie ("Play On", "Some Hearts") and Kelly ("Stronger") and two country albums that keep on selling, Season 10's Scotty McCreery's "Clear as Day" (1K more at 1.163M total) and Season 9's Casey James' debut (1K for a total of 74K.)
Speaking of Season 9, runner-up Crystal Bowersox's "All That for This" was released this week so we can see what kind of sales numbers she has next week. I do not expect super numbers from this release, but hopefully it will be enough to help her pay her bills until she starts her starring role as Patsy Cline on Broadway.
American Idol Top 8 DialIdol Analysis - The Day After
Another week of American Idol and time for another elimination. First let's compare last weeks DialIdol raw numbers to the known raw numbers for this week. Last week's DialIdol raw numbers versus results, we already know that Burnell Taylor has a lot more fans voting for him via other means than phone/DialIdol since he was on the bottom of the list in DialIdol raw votes but did not end up in the bottom 3. So for this week we can ignore his low number of votes again and assume he is safe. If we look at last week, again we noticed that after Burnell were Paul Jolley and then Amber Holcomb, two of the people in the bottom 3.
If we follow the same trend this week, the next two would be Candice Glover and Devin Velez, followed by Lazaro. Candice, however, actually had 48 busy signals which is a large percentage of her total votes this week (933, much lower than her 1,400 votes last week), so I find it hard to imagine Candice would be in the Bottom 3. But if she was she would probably not be the very lowest (probably Devin) or she would be saved. I think Amber will probably be safe from the Bottom 3 this week, but if not her, that who? Devin is a definite in the Bottom 3, but the other two must be two of Amber, Burnell, Candice or Lazaro. Could this actually be Lazaro's week to be in the Bottom 3?
If we use preliminary WhatNotToSing ratings, after Lazaro (whose votes defy any performance ratings), the next lowest solo performance ratings would be Angie Miller, then Devin and then Burnell. I cannot imagine Angie would fall into the Bottom 3, so this may very well be the first week Burnell will be in the Bottom 3. along with Devin. I would be very happy to see Lazaro in the Bottom 3 with Devin and Burnell and I sure hope it is not Amber again. I am pretty sure Janelle Arthur and Kree Harrison are safe from being Bottom 3, and it would be shocking (but not impossible) to see either Candice or Angie in the Bottom 3. Angie, however, again has far and away the most busy signals on DialIdol (187), so with her large fan base I am guessing she will not be in the Bottom 3. Incredibly, the second most likely female to be in the bottom 3 besides Amber is probably Candice (she did perform first too.)
Who would the judge save this week? I am pretty sure they would not save Devin after he has been in the Bottom 3 for two weeks in a row, but would they save Burnell or Lazaro? I think they would probably save any female who might be eliminated, but would they waste the save on Amber (knowing she is probably the least popular gal?) We will have to see tonight!
Album Review: David Archuleta: 'No Matter How Far' (2013)
No Matter How Far (c) 2013 E1 Music |
Like Begin., No Matter How Far features tracks that Archuleta recorded prior to embarking on his mission. However, unlike Begin. (which mostly featured covers of well-known songs), the songs on No Matter How Far are all original compositions and demo recordings, polished and mastered to sound like completed songs.
On No Matter How Far, the American Idol Season 7 runner up delivers ten original songs, but as has been the case recently, it lacks commercial sensibilities and focuses more on inspiration and reflection- with the odd love song thrown in for good measure.
As always, below is the track-wise review of the album:
1. "Nothing Else Better To Do": A pleasant opener, "Nothing Else Better To do" is the kind of song you'd like to listen to on lazy summer days. A song about doing nothing else but being in love, it recalls acts like Train and Simple Plan and works perfectly with Archuleta's soft voice.
2. "Everything And More": A mid-tempo ballad that showcases Archuleta's falsetto really well. I'm a big fan of the chorus- this song is quite pleasant and works perfectly with Archuleta's voice.
3. "Don't Run Away": It's hard to believe that this song was just a demo. It's been scrubbed to perfection and turns out to be one of Archuleta's best recordings ever. Staying right in the vein of Archuleta's inspirational songs (which he's come to be known for). A powerful and emotional chorus reminds us that we're really not that alone. A highlight of the album.
4. "Tell Me": This slow ballad asking a serious question is a bit slow for my liking, but it goes without saying that Archuleta delivers a solid performance.
5. "Love Don't Hate": Aah, finally something more upbeat. I got a strong Backstreet Boys/N*Sync vibe from this song; I don't know why it reminded me of 90s boybands. Anyway, this foot-tapping track is a definite highlight of the album, mostly because its one of the rare uptempo songs on here.
6. "Wait": Another song that doesn't do much for me. It isn't very catchy, but at least it's not a snoozy ballad.
7. "Heart Falls Out": I thought this was another enjoyable song. Although at times Archuleta's vocals sound rushed and strained, it turns out to be quite fun and engaging.
8. "Notice Me": One of my favorite songs on the album. It could be a radio hit, but alas, Archuleta isn't in the country to promote it. It's not fast-paced or upbeat, but a ballad more in the vein of "Crush".
9. "I'll Never Go": A song that perfectly reflects Archuleta's life at this point as well as the theme of the album. It's a heartfelt ballad that tells us he's never really "gone". Another shining moment on the album.
10. "Forevermore": This song was released last year, and was included on this album for posterity. With minimal accompaniment (just a guitar and piano and some background vocals), this song is emotional, well written, and performed perfectly by Archuleta. One of the best songs on the album AND one of Archuleta's best songs, period.
Like his previous record, Begin, No Matter How Far turns out to be another ballad-oriented album. I have no issue with ballads, but there really isn't much commercial significance in this album, if I'm being honest. Sure, there are a few upbeat songs, but they aren't remarkable. The entire beginning of the album is slow and only picks up momentum more than halfway through. There were times listening to this album when I just skipped forward because I was starting to get a little bored- no matter how meaningful the songs were. Sadly, the album ends up becoming repetitive and dull. There aren't too many memorable songs on this album- mostly because these are just demo songs and rough recordings that have been mastered and cleaned.
However, Archuleta's sincerity and youthful personality shines through the album. You won't be seeing David until 2014, when he returns from his mission, so that alone is reason to get this.
My favorite songs on the album: "Nothing Else Better To Do", "Don't Run Away", "Love Don't Hate", "Notice Me", "Forevermore".
RATING: ★★★1/2
Buy "No Matter How Far" now: iTunes | Amazon
Related Review: David Archuleta: "Begin." (2012)
American Idol Top 9 "What Not To Sing" Scores and Betting Odds
I was not surprised to see Paul Jolley heading home last night on American Idol, but like many other folks I was not overly pleased to see Amber Holcomb voted into the Bottom 3. I have my "What Not To Sing" scores graphed above (sorted from highest to lowest by this weeks score) with the two bottom 3 remaining contestants (Amber and Devin Velez) with a yellow column this week and the eliminated Paul with a red column. Amber has given consistently solid performances every single week, and even though this week may not have been her best, she still gave a better performance than any of the guys this week. I know my cat Super Voted all of his 50 Facebook votes for Amber this week, but I suppose that was not enough. He will have to get all those other cats on Facebook to vote for her too.
I was curious to see how last night's results would change the betting odds for the final 8, and I see the numbers have been posted:
Angie Miller has actually popped back in front of Candice Glover as the favorite again, even after a performance this week that was not one of her finest. I find it odd that Amber still has better odds (14/1) than Janelle Arthur (18/1) after being in the Bottom 3 this week. Perhaps the odds makers think that now that she has been in the Bottom 3 her fan base will be more dedicated in voting her to safety for the next few weeks.
Janelle and Lazaro are now tied at 18/1, which makes Lazaro still the most likely guy to win, then Burnell Taylor at 20/1 and then finally Devin Velez at 33/1 as the least likely winner in the eyes of the odds makers.
Phillip Sees Bigs Sales Spike After Performance, Colton Sees His End
The performances on American Idol shows have a huge effect on album sales. One week after performing on the show Phillip Phillips saw sales of his "World From the Side of the Moon" jump 90% to 22,000 units for the week, bringing his total to 771K. That was good enough to jump him back up to #18 on the BillBoard chart. On the flip side, two weeks after Angie Miller performed "Never Gone" on the show, Colton Dixon saw sales for his "The Messenger" drop back to more normal numbers after a big jump last week. His BillBoard rank is back in the mid 100's as expected (#120). Kelly Clarkson and Carrie Underwood continue to have steady sales with about the same numbers again, 10K in sales for each of them bringing Kelly's "Greatest Hits" album total to 331K and Carrie's "Blown Away" to 1.356M. Carrie's "Blown Away" along with Scotty McCreery's "Clear as Day" and Kelly's "Stronger" have pushed my overall graph too big to see the lower sales folks so I will again show both versions of my graph, the overall and the closer in one too.
American Idol Season 12 Top 9 - DialIdol Raw Numbers
Last week the known rankings of the total American Idol votes helped show how well the raw DialIdol numbers lined up with the actual votes, and overall it did very well. It placed Kree Harrison, Angie Miller and Candice Glover in the top 3, and placed Curtis Finch Jr at #10. Let's fill in the places in the middle from last week:
Rank | DialIdol Rank (Raw) | Actual AI Rank |
4 | Janelle Arthur (1851) | Lazaro Arbos |
5 | Lazaro Arbos (1703) | Amber Holcomb |
6 | Paul Jolley (1595) | Janelle Arthur |
7 | Amber Holcomb (1604) | Burnell Taylor |
8 | Devin Velez (1425) | Paul Jolley |
9 | Burnell Taylor (754) | Devin Velez |
This shows that DialIdol overestimates Paul and Janelle's ranking, and underestimates Amber and Burnell's. So if we use last night's total tally shown above, we can draw some conclusions. First off, Angie Miller is yet again the only contestant with any significant percentage of busy signals so we probably bet she will be again in the Top 3. I am not sure if Janelle will be in the actual Top 3 since her DialIdol votes had been overinflated, but I am guessing she will not be in the bottom 3. Devin seemed to get a lot more votes this week, and after being second from the bottom last week, I am guessing his fans will have voted a lot to keep him safe for this week. I am also somewhat surprised how few votes Candice Glover received after another strong performance. I am betting Paul Jolley and Burnell Taylor will be in the bottom 3 this week, but I am not sure who will be joining them. I would have hoped it would be Lazaro Arbos, but knowing how popular he is it may be someone else, but who? If Amber Holcomb ends up in the bottom 3 and Lazaro does not, there is definitely something wrong in the world!
Another thing I noticed was that there were over 19,000 DialIdol votes cast last week, but less than 16,000 votes cast this week. Are people already not caring that much? Curtis Finch had less than 1,000 votes last week so it cannot be just because he is gone. People just used DialIdol less, and March Madness games have not even started yet!
I also noticed last evening that the betting odds for the 9 remaining contestants had changed slightly from my numbers from over the past weekend.
Over the weekend Candice and Angie were tied as 9/4 favorites, but now Candice has pulled ahead at 2/1 where Angie still sits at 9/4. Kree's odds increased just slightly from 5/2 to 11/4 but everyone else stayed the same. I am not sure what changes these very slight changes.
Young Men's Hairstyles
Men s hairstyles: latest men s haircuts
Young men s hairstyle 2012 2012 hairstyles short long layered related posts young mens hairstyles cool mens hair hairstyle for young men with free spirited split bangs mens hairstyles young male star hairstyles. Hairstyles for young men - beauty tips , hairstyles , makeup and this section contains several great photo galleries for men looking for a
American Idol Season 12 Betting Odds - Top 9 Weekend Edition
Now that Curtis Finch is headed back here to St. Louis, we have nine contestants left on American Idol, and we even were given the vote rankings on the show this past week. That helped to make a big shift in the betting odds for a number of contestants.
The big switcheroo in odds now that the voting ranks are known was between Candice Glover and Janelle Arthur. Since folks now know that Candice is among the top 3 vote receivers and Janelle is not, that pushed Candice into being one of the favorites now (9/4 odds tied with Angie Miller and slightly ahead of Kree Harrison at 5/2) where Janelle is now tied with Amber Holcomb for the 4th/5th favorite spots with much higher 12/1 odds. We also now know for sure that Lazaro Arbos (14/1) is the most popular guy and that Burnell Taylor did not receive as many votes as any of the ladies. That drops Burnell's odds (25/1) in the bottom 3 of the remaining contestants along with Paul Jolley and Devin Velez, who are both the big long shots now at 33/1.
I sure hope these results shake up the remaining contestants into bringing some more interesting, upbeat performances to the show. Last week's Top 10 show was full of ballads and could use some livening up. If Devin, Paul or Burnell want to last much longer they had better perform with some more excitement and try to win some new fans or they are going home in the next few weeks. Amber and Janelle should take notice too, especially Amber who seems extremely talented but has picked some incredibly boring songs to perform.
I will be curious to see what the results will be for the "11th tour member" vote between Aubrey Cleland and Charlie Askew. Whereas Aubrey is clearly a much better vocalist than Charlie, she also has been hit with "boring ballad disease" whereas Charlie is much more unpredictable and is definitely much more interesting (although sometimes in a very bad way!)
American Idol Top 10 - What Not To Sing Ratings and Trend
After last night's ballad fest on American Idol, I was curious to see if the What Not To Sing would again look like a ladies' night. And sure enough the trend continues. This week looks even more "pink heavy" than last week, and we are not talking about Lazaro Arbos' outfits, either!
The top 4 ratings all go to ladies (it was top 3 and "4 of the top 5" last week) and those 4 have been the consistently top rated contestants for the past 3 weeks, Candice Glover, Amber Holcomb, Angie Miller and Kree Harrison. Burnell Taylor again leads the guys, but his rating of 50 does not come close to any of the top 4 ladies this week (or his own 74 from last week). Simiarly Devin Velez saw a big drop, from being rated 69 and 71 the first two weeks to only 46 this week.
Nobody saw an improvement this week over last week except for Candice and that was from an already stellar 88 to an even better 89. It is interesting, though, how even though Candice has continued to rate the highest, her betting odds of actually winning continue to trail the other ladies, even Janelle Arthur who continues to be a disappointment performance wise. I think the odds makers assume Candice will end up #2 or #3 and not win because the voters will pick someone else instead of her, despite her astonishing singing skills. Frankly, I can believe that too.
American Idol Season 12 Top 10 - the Morning After DialIdol Numbers
Now that the voting is over for Top 10 night on American Idol, I could find the final tally for DialIdol votes for the contestants. Last week using DialIdol there were 15K votes cast for the ladies, and 12K votes cast for the gentlemen. This week there were about 19K total, with the vast majority being cast for female contestants. Last week Lazaro Arbos led all other contestants in total votes cast with over 3,400 votes cast, but this week he only received about 1,700. He is still the leading guy, but 4 gals beat him in total votes cast: Kree Harrison with about 3,700, Angie Miller with about 3,200, Candice Glover with over 2,200 and Janelle Arthur with over 1,800. Interestingly the only two contestants last night with any perceptible numbers of busy signals were Angie and Lazaro. Angie had 193, Lazaro had 128, Kree had 27 and Paul Jolley had 16. Everyone else had less than 10 busy signals. I think very few people are calling in votes with phones anymore. In fact we can compare those remaining contestants who received at least 10 busy signals last week and see how many they received this week:
The only contestants who saw an increase of busy signals were Lazaro (from 56 last week to 128 this week) and Kree (23 to 27.) Paul was actually very steady with 16 each week, but Devin fell from 48 to 5, Candice went from 14 to 5 and Curtis Finch went from 37 to 0 this week. From the busy signals, the only two folks we can determine this week are definitely safe are Angie and probably Lazaro. The call volume may be too low. Out of curiosity I checked last years number on their Top 11 week (the first week when the guys and gals were combined) and the total DialIdol raw votes cast were over 38,000 with 5 different contestants having more than 100 busy signals. That is a pretty significant drop.
American Idol Weekly Album Sales Numbers - Angie Miller Helps Colton Dixon
Phillip = green, Carrie = orange, Kelly = lt blue, Colton = dk blue |
If we look at the total sales, this actually marks the 75th week since Scotty McCreery's "Clear As Day" was released (and it STILL sold another 1,000 units) and that incredibly long progression of continued sales makes my graph much too long. Sorry, Scotty, your album sales have been too strong too long to make my graph very readable:
So I thought I would create another zoomed in graph that just stops after 30 weeks and goes up to a maximum of 500K in sales for all the albums:
This way you can see the trends of slower selling Idols better (i.e. ones not named Carrie, Kelly, Scotty or Phillip.) I was curious how Colton's sales were comparing to folks like James Durbin, Adam Lambert or Haley Reinhart, and with my old graph skewed to track the platinum selling albums, their lower numbers were harder to see.
My Weekly 1 Hour After American Idol Voting Starts Snapshot
Just like last week I took a snapshot of the raw voting numbers off of DialIdol to see how the Top 10 voting this week compares to the Big Top 20 voting last week. I tool the screen shot above of DialIdol exactly one hour after the show ended for comparison. Whereas an hour after the gals show last week had 5,300 total raw votes and 4,800 an hour after the guys show, this week there were over 7,500 votes already cast. With the guys and gals combined this week in the Top 10, we can see that the ladies are definitely getting more total votes with Kree Harrison, Angie Miller, and Candice Glover receiving the largest number of dialed in votes. At this point last week, Lazaro Arbos actually had the most votes with almost 1,400, but this week Kree leads with nearly 1,700 followed by Angie with 1,100 and Candice with almost 1,000. The leading guy in terms of raw votes is Paul Jolley this week, with Lazaro right behind him. The bottom three in terms of raw votes are Burnell Taylor, Curtis Finch and Devin Velez -- all three guys and all three pretty expendable. After the show ended this evening I was guessing one of guys was probably going home tomorrow, and I realized it did not really matter which one it was. There are a couple I would prefer see leaving, but unfortunately we cannot vote to get rid of people. I cast my Facebook Super Vote and I will be mildly interested to see what guy leaves tomorrow. The only "shock" elimination tomorrow for me would be if a girl goes home (although Janelle has a slight chance of that happening, but I actually think she is pretty safe.)
American Idol 2013: Ranking The Top 10
With the American Idol Top 10 taking the stage this week, I thought it would be fun to rank them. Mostly because I love ranking things. The Season 12 Top 10 isn't the best we've ever seen, but we certainly do have some potential stars there.
Below are the Season 12 contestants ranked on the basis of their talent, past performances, chances of winning, overall marketability, and just how I feel about them.
10. AMBER HOLCOMB Falling at the bottom of the group is Amber Holcomb. She's good, no doubt, but her performances give me a rather pageant-y feel. She needs to inject more emotion and charisma into her performances and not rely on Whitney Houston songs to get her through all the time.
9. BURNELL TAYLOR Burnell isn't bad, it's just that others are better. Personally, I'm not a fan of his voice. It's jarring and verging on annoying. I also see very little commercial potential in Burnell. Unless he delivers a solid performance, he's not staying very long.
8. DEVIN VELEZ Okay, I love the Spanish/English thing, but Devin just doesn't make me want to pick up the phone and vote. He just falls in the "has-beens" category.
7. JANELLE ARTHUR Maybe Skylar Laine spoiled me last year, but every performance of Janelle's sounds pitchy and harsh to me. I think she and Kree are dividing the (very important) country vote this season, but I'm certain Kree will be the longer lasting of the two.
6.CURTIS FINCH, JR. Every season, we have a Gospel singer. 2011 was Jacob Lusk. 2012 was Joshua Ledet. Curtis has good prospects, but I can't see him in the Top 3. He's following the path that's already been travelled, and that might lead to a lot of fatigue among viewers.
5. LAZARO ARBOS The original frontrunner, Lazaro's star has kind of faded recently. He hasn't had a moment since his memorable audition, and refuses to stray from similar songs. That said, he's amazing and inspiring and could go as far as Top 3.
4. CANDICE GLOVER She's a crowd favorite now, and has a jaw dropping voice. I'm yet to put my finger on what kind of genres she sings, but she continues to knock our socks off every week. I'm a Glover Lover.
3. PAUL JOLLEY Paul is most likely to get the "cute boy" votes this season. I'm a big fan of his country-pop style (which is personally something I aspire to). He's very marketable and has great personality to match.
2. KREE HARRISON She's sultry, independent and above all, real. I just can't wait to listen to an entire album of hers. Her natural country-bluegrass style is unmatched. There's no one in the industry like her right now. This girl needs to be in the Top 2 this year.
1. ANGIE MILLER Angie is thoroughly original, talented and fits the "female winner" package perfectly. Aside from her stunning, pretty looks, she's a brilliant songwriter and plays piano too. Right now, she's the best and deserves to win.
I think we can finally see two girls in the finale this year. At least, that's what I want. Kree and Angie facing off would be an awesome show. We have a pretty decent group this year, that's not as good is last year's, but will do. My Top 5 picks are all incredibly talented and I see any of them winning.
What are your thoughts? Who are YOU rooting for?
Don't miss the American Idol Top 10 perform songs sung by past American Idol winners this Wednesday, and the results show featuring last season's winner Phillip Phillips and Bon Jovi on Thursday.
The Stage Is Set! photo courtesy: FOX |
Below are the Season 12 contestants ranked on the basis of their talent, past performances, chances of winning, overall marketability, and just how I feel about them.
10. AMBER HOLCOMB Falling at the bottom of the group is Amber Holcomb. She's good, no doubt, but her performances give me a rather pageant-y feel. She needs to inject more emotion and charisma into her performances and not rely on Whitney Houston songs to get her through all the time.
9. BURNELL TAYLOR Burnell isn't bad, it's just that others are better. Personally, I'm not a fan of his voice. It's jarring and verging on annoying. I also see very little commercial potential in Burnell. Unless he delivers a solid performance, he's not staying very long.
8. DEVIN VELEZ Okay, I love the Spanish/English thing, but Devin just doesn't make me want to pick up the phone and vote. He just falls in the "has-beens" category.
6.CURTIS FINCH, JR. Every season, we have a Gospel singer. 2011 was Jacob Lusk. 2012 was Joshua Ledet. Curtis has good prospects, but I can't see him in the Top 3. He's following the path that's already been travelled, and that might lead to a lot of fatigue among viewers.
5. LAZARO ARBOS The original frontrunner, Lazaro's star has kind of faded recently. He hasn't had a moment since his memorable audition, and refuses to stray from similar songs. That said, he's amazing and inspiring and could go as far as Top 3.
3. PAUL JOLLEY Paul is most likely to get the "cute boy" votes this season. I'm a big fan of his country-pop style (which is personally something I aspire to). He's very marketable and has great personality to match.
2. KREE HARRISON She's sultry, independent and above all, real. I just can't wait to listen to an entire album of hers. Her natural country-bluegrass style is unmatched. There's no one in the industry like her right now. This girl needs to be in the Top 2 this year.
1. ANGIE MILLER Angie is thoroughly original, talented and fits the "female winner" package perfectly. Aside from her stunning, pretty looks, she's a brilliant songwriter and plays piano too. Right now, she's the best and deserves to win.
I think we can finally see two girls in the finale this year. At least, that's what I want. Kree and Angie facing off would be an awesome show. We have a pretty decent group this year, that's not as good is last year's, but will do. My Top 5 picks are all incredibly talented and I see any of them winning.
What are your thoughts? Who are YOU rooting for?
Don't miss the American Idol Top 10 perform songs sung by past American Idol winners this Wednesday, and the results show featuring last season's winner Phillip Phillips and Bon Jovi on Thursday.
Movie Review: Oz The Great and Powerful (2013)
Disney's new fantasy adventure may lack depth- but more than makes up for that with visual wizardry and an interesting look at the origins of the story.
It's mind boggling how many adaptations of L. Frank Baum's Oz works we've seen in the past 70-plus years. There's the one everyone knows and loves: 1939's musical The Wizard of Oz starring Judy Garland. 1978's urban The Wiz starring Diana Ross and Michael Jackson. 1985's Disney cult sequel Return to Oz. The revered 2003 Broadway prequel Wicked, which launched Idina Menzel and Kristin Chenoweth to superstardom. There's been a 1990s animated The Wizard of Oz TV series based on the 1939 film (ruby slippers and all) and a recent miniseries The Witches of Oz. And in case you forget, the 2005 TV-movie starring The Muppets.
Every new incarnation of the Oz story tries to reinvent the wheel. Some work, some don't. Baum's books lie in the public domain, which means that any studio can pick them up and adapt them to their liking. Which is exactly what Disney has done this year.
2010's Tim Burton-Johnny Depp collaboration Alice In Wonderland was an unprecedented smash hit. It grossed $116 million in it's US opening weekend and went on to make a billion worldwide. Of course, several factors played into Alice's success. It was released just after Avatar at the peak of the 3D phenomenon. The potent combination of Burton and Depp was another factor. Hoping to recreate some of that magic (especially after 2012's John Carter debacle), Disney's new Oz incarnation Oz The Great and Powerful flies into theatres this month.
In perfect tribute to the original 1939 film (the prequel to which this movie aspires to be) Oz The Great and Powerful opens in slightly sepia-toned black and white and remains so for the first 20 minutes. The hypnotic opening credits do a fantastic job of showcasing the 3D effects. We are introduced to circus magician Oscar Diggs (James Franco), who lives a life of conning people and impressing women with music boxes passed off as family heirlooms. Making an escape in a hot air balloon, Oscar finds himself transported into the land of Oz, a fantastic world populated by strange plants, creatures and mysterious witches. Quickly, he meets Theodora (Mila Kunis), one of Oz's witches and Finley, an endearing and brilliantly animated flying monkey (voiced by Zach Braff, who also appears in the opening). Together they set off for the Emerald City, with an infatuated Theodora believing that Oscar is indeed the prophesied wizard come to save the citizens of Oz. Theodora's sister Evanora (Rachel Weisz) is not convinced, and sends Oscar off on a quest to destroy the wicked witch's wand. Oscar and his new sidekick, Finley team up with a girl made of china (wonderfully voiced by Joey King, who also has a scene in the opening) and travel to the Dark forest, where they happen to meet Glinda the Good Witch (Michelle Williams, who's also in the opening as a love interest). Things are straightened out, and Oscar finds himself facing off against the true Wicked Witch and saving the people of Oz, fulfilling his destiny and becoming a better man.
It goes without saying that the film is visually dazzling. The CGI is some of the best I have ever seen in a movie. There are a few parts where it looks fake, but overall, it's impressive. Save for a few gimmicks, the 3D is mind blowing. You'll find things flying out of the screen all the time-including mischievous water fairies and terrifying winged monkeys. A particular highlight is the tornado sequence. In short, visually, you're not going to feel disappointed.
The land of Oz is marvelous in itself. Disney and Sam Raimi do a great job of recreating the wonder we saw in the original film. This time around, newer technology gives us a more well-realized vision of the land. Butterfly trees, ruby flowers, and awe-inspiring scenes of nature are the standouts. I was disappointed in the Emerald City, which was so well portrayed in the 1939 film. It looks grand on the outside, but its interior is barely given focus. We see some dark streets and overhead bridges- but many citizens aren't even dressed in green. For me, that was a major problem! The Munchkins are, this time around, a big mixture. There's black and even Asian ones in the boiling pot called Oz. I loved their costumes- they were carefully differentiated from those in the original film (in order to evade copyright infringement) but are still elaborately detailed and vivid.
The most satisfying aspect of the film is the fact that it has a strong, cohesive story. It was compelling and emotionally investing enough and provides a fantastic back story to The Wizard of Oz. Sadly, the actors don't do much justice to their roles. Franco was not convincing, neither as a fraud nor as a changed man. I didn't even know that he was supposed to be eccentric. It just came across as fake. The three women's talents were underused as well. For most part, the bland dialogue brought them even lower, and in the end we just have a bunch of passable characters who look very pretty.
The two characters who stole the show were both non-human ones. Finley the Flying Monkey and China Girl, who are both brilliantly animated and wonderfully voiced. Finley pretty much steals every scene he's in, and most of the audience's laughs are thanks to him. China Girl lends a little pathos to the film. She has a few really fun parts that lift the mood of the film ("I wanna be a heart. Can I be a heart?"). Her animation is top-notch and she looks like real china.
I'd not recommend this movie for very young children (say, under 10), because there are some truly frightening scenes. Women transform into gruesome witches and deadly winged monkeys claw through the screen. Basically, nightmares for your little ones.
One thing that fans of the 1939 movie will love is the sheer number of references this film makes to it. In fact, the entire movie is more or less a homage to The Wizard of Oz. The film opens in black and white, with vivid color bleeding in as soon as we enter Oz. It's not as effective as the iconic "door open" in the original, but works well. Munchkins break into song, the Yellow Brick Road has its spiral start in Munchkinland, and Glinda travels by bubble. The sleep-inducing poppy field is still very much there. Even a lot of dialogue was directly inspired by the 1939 film.
The film sets itself up perfectly for a sequel (which by the way, is happening). Sam Raimi's style makes this CGI-loaded fest a real treat. Its a bit too long (2 hours and 7 minutes) and has issues with consistency, but Oz The Great and Powerful offers up great entertainment and a fantastic origin story.
Clearly, Disney has faith in their live action-CGI extravaganzas. With Oz becoming the #1 movie at the global box office this month, it could be well on its way to making a billion. Disney has a slew of live action-CGI adaptations of famous stories, including next summer's Angelina Jolie-starrer Maleficent (Sleeping Beauty from the villain's perspective), and possible adaptations of Cinderella and Beauty and the Beast. If the success of Oz is any indication, there's no end in sight. Like it or not.
Oz The Great and Powerful is a good film. What it lacks in substance, it makes up for in razzmatazz. Not just for fans of all things Oz, but for those who like their movies grand and dazzling, Oz is a must watch.
RATING: ★★★1/2
Related Review: Mariah Carey: "Almost Home" (Theme from Oz The Great and Powerful)
It's mind boggling how many adaptations of L. Frank Baum's Oz works we've seen in the past 70-plus years. There's the one everyone knows and loves: 1939's musical The Wizard of Oz starring Judy Garland. 1978's urban The Wiz starring Diana Ross and Michael Jackson. 1985's Disney cult sequel Return to Oz. The revered 2003 Broadway prequel Wicked, which launched Idina Menzel and Kristin Chenoweth to superstardom. There's been a 1990s animated The Wizard of Oz TV series based on the 1939 film (ruby slippers and all) and a recent miniseries The Witches of Oz. And in case you forget, the 2005 TV-movie starring The Muppets.
Every new incarnation of the Oz story tries to reinvent the wheel. Some work, some don't. Baum's books lie in the public domain, which means that any studio can pick them up and adapt them to their liking. Which is exactly what Disney has done this year.
2010's Tim Burton-Johnny Depp collaboration Alice In Wonderland was an unprecedented smash hit. It grossed $116 million in it's US opening weekend and went on to make a billion worldwide. Of course, several factors played into Alice's success. It was released just after Avatar at the peak of the 3D phenomenon. The potent combination of Burton and Depp was another factor. Hoping to recreate some of that magic (especially after 2012's John Carter debacle), Disney's new Oz incarnation Oz The Great and Powerful flies into theatres this month.
In perfect tribute to the original 1939 film (the prequel to which this movie aspires to be) Oz The Great and Powerful opens in slightly sepia-toned black and white and remains so for the first 20 minutes. The hypnotic opening credits do a fantastic job of showcasing the 3D effects. We are introduced to circus magician Oscar Diggs (James Franco), who lives a life of conning people and impressing women with music boxes passed off as family heirlooms. Making an escape in a hot air balloon, Oscar finds himself transported into the land of Oz, a fantastic world populated by strange plants, creatures and mysterious witches. Quickly, he meets Theodora (Mila Kunis), one of Oz's witches and Finley, an endearing and brilliantly animated flying monkey (voiced by Zach Braff, who also appears in the opening). Together they set off for the Emerald City, with an infatuated Theodora believing that Oscar is indeed the prophesied wizard come to save the citizens of Oz. Theodora's sister Evanora (Rachel Weisz) is not convinced, and sends Oscar off on a quest to destroy the wicked witch's wand. Oscar and his new sidekick, Finley team up with a girl made of china (wonderfully voiced by Joey King, who also has a scene in the opening) and travel to the Dark forest, where they happen to meet Glinda the Good Witch (Michelle Williams, who's also in the opening as a love interest). Things are straightened out, and Oscar finds himself facing off against the true Wicked Witch and saving the people of Oz, fulfilling his destiny and becoming a better man.
It goes without saying that the film is visually dazzling. The CGI is some of the best I have ever seen in a movie. There are a few parts where it looks fake, but overall, it's impressive. Save for a few gimmicks, the 3D is mind blowing. You'll find things flying out of the screen all the time-including mischievous water fairies and terrifying winged monkeys. A particular highlight is the tornado sequence. In short, visually, you're not going to feel disappointed.
The land of Oz is marvelous in itself. Disney and Sam Raimi do a great job of recreating the wonder we saw in the original film. This time around, newer technology gives us a more well-realized vision of the land. Butterfly trees, ruby flowers, and awe-inspiring scenes of nature are the standouts. I was disappointed in the Emerald City, which was so well portrayed in the 1939 film. It looks grand on the outside, but its interior is barely given focus. We see some dark streets and overhead bridges- but many citizens aren't even dressed in green. For me, that was a major problem! The Munchkins are, this time around, a big mixture. There's black and even Asian ones in the boiling pot called Oz. I loved their costumes- they were carefully differentiated from those in the original film (in order to evade copyright infringement) but are still elaborately detailed and vivid.
The most satisfying aspect of the film is the fact that it has a strong, cohesive story. It was compelling and emotionally investing enough and provides a fantastic back story to The Wizard of Oz. Sadly, the actors don't do much justice to their roles. Franco was not convincing, neither as a fraud nor as a changed man. I didn't even know that he was supposed to be eccentric. It just came across as fake. The three women's talents were underused as well. For most part, the bland dialogue brought them even lower, and in the end we just have a bunch of passable characters who look very pretty.
The two characters who stole the show were both non-human ones. Finley the Flying Monkey and China Girl, who are both brilliantly animated and wonderfully voiced. Finley pretty much steals every scene he's in, and most of the audience's laughs are thanks to him. China Girl lends a little pathos to the film. She has a few really fun parts that lift the mood of the film ("I wanna be a heart. Can I be a heart?"). Her animation is top-notch and she looks like real china.
I'd not recommend this movie for very young children (say, under 10), because there are some truly frightening scenes. Women transform into gruesome witches and deadly winged monkeys claw through the screen. Basically, nightmares for your little ones.
One thing that fans of the 1939 movie will love is the sheer number of references this film makes to it. In fact, the entire movie is more or less a homage to The Wizard of Oz. The film opens in black and white, with vivid color bleeding in as soon as we enter Oz. It's not as effective as the iconic "door open" in the original, but works well. Munchkins break into song, the Yellow Brick Road has its spiral start in Munchkinland, and Glinda travels by bubble. The sleep-inducing poppy field is still very much there. Even a lot of dialogue was directly inspired by the 1939 film.
The film sets itself up perfectly for a sequel (which by the way, is happening). Sam Raimi's style makes this CGI-loaded fest a real treat. Its a bit too long (2 hours and 7 minutes) and has issues with consistency, but Oz The Great and Powerful offers up great entertainment and a fantastic origin story.
Clearly, Disney has faith in their live action-CGI extravaganzas. With Oz becoming the #1 movie at the global box office this month, it could be well on its way to making a billion. Disney has a slew of live action-CGI adaptations of famous stories, including next summer's Angelina Jolie-starrer Maleficent (Sleeping Beauty from the villain's perspective), and possible adaptations of Cinderella and Beauty and the Beast. If the success of Oz is any indication, there's no end in sight. Like it or not.
Oz The Great and Powerful is a good film. What it lacks in substance, it makes up for in razzmatazz. Not just for fans of all things Oz, but for those who like their movies grand and dazzling, Oz is a must watch.
RATING: ★★★1/2
Related Review: Mariah Carey: "Almost Home" (Theme from Oz The Great and Powerful)
American Idol Odds Shift Between Shows!
I am not sure why this happens but sometimes the American Idol betting odds change quite a bit even though the show has not been on the air since last Thursday. The front runners remain the same, but it is always the lesser known "mid pack" contestants that often switch around during the week. On Saturday, the odds showed Candice Glover and Lazaro Arbos tied at 12/1 odds, then Amber Holcomb at 14/1, Devin Velez and Paul Jolley tied at 15/1 and then Burnell Taylor at 16/1 with Curtis Finch by himself at 20/1 odds. Now a few days later without any show broadcast the odds have changed. Now Candice is tied with Burnell at 12/1, Lazaro has dropped to 14/1 and Amber has dropped to 16/1. Angela Miller, Kree Harrison and Janelle Arthur have not changed on the top of the list and Curtis remains the same at the bottom. It is very strange. Here is my new ordered chart of the Top 10 contestants:
The only folks who changed were Burnell, Lazaro and Amber, and I have no idea why they did. I had thought Amber would be safe for a few more weeks, but maybe someone else knows something more than I do.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)